So, it finally happened; the Venn diagram of Technology and Pokemon crossed to form Pokemon Go. A game that's caused the world to become obsessed with the little cartoon critters.
10 year old me would be so happy right now. So why aren't i?
Lets back up a little bit. Pokemon has been around a long while. I've been a big fan since i was around 8, and i was given a gameboy colour with Pokemon Red for Christmas. It was great! It held everything a kid could want; adventure, freedom, acceptance, strategy, and friendship. It taught me so much.
I guess the one thing that always stuck out from the originals (except some of the terrifying artwork) was that the reason why you beat "Gary" (Or "Buttface" if you're mature) was that you cared about your Pokemon. Stupid, and lame, but when you're 10, this mattered a lot.
I wasn't a big fan of school. Bullies, being out performed by siblings or friends, it just made me feel bad about myself. I remember multiple occasions where i'd be laughed at by my sisters for not knowing a spelling of a certain word. Or i'd fail a test because of handwriting.
I Feel like there's a level of irony here that I'm writing a blog.
But Pokemon didn't care. It was an escape. My friends played it. We'd share tips and tricks. On the rare occasion, we'd trade. I remember one Friday afternoon we all ended up with Mew's, because one friend know the duplication glitch and then traded one to everyone.
It was just a game that didn't care. You'd loose, then go and train your Pokemon more. Winning by the skin of your teeth was one of the best moments. A lucky Thunderbolt hit, or maybe a cheeky critical hit. Oh and the music! Getting you so pumped when facing a Gym leader, or so nervous when trying to catch that super rare Pokemon (fuck you Chansey).
I guess i should do a little bit of a disclaimer; i don't dislike the game. It's enjoyable, and finding / catching Pokemon is pretty great.
BUT! There just isn't much to it. Catching Pokemon is easy. There's little to no challenge in it. You throw a Pokeball, it fails, you throw again. Boom; it's yours. There is certainly a thrill stumbling across a Pokemon not in your collection, but it's all down to luck on actually finding the sod.
Gyms are pretty painful too. First, there is little to no tutorial on how to battle (actually, there's no tutorial at all throughout the game), and it seems to be just mashing the attack button. Once you've built up a meter, you can do the secondary attack. Swiping left and right allows you to dodgeâ¦ sort of? In essence, you tap the screen until something dies. Yay. All that strategy. You don't get the feeling of it being a hard won battle. You walk away bemused, either with or without the gym. I find myself questioning why do i bother with them?
Then, of course, there's the Candy and Stardust form of levelling / evolution. As much as i hated this to start with, it does make some form of sense. It gives you reason to keep catching the same monster over and over again, and strengthens the reason as to why you need to keep wondering around and exploring. Pretty good synergy between mechanics.
Oh and of course; the bugs. Dear god, so many bugs with the app. It crashes all of the time. Failing to catch a Pokemon because you lost internet connection for 5 seconds is lame. Not being able to log in, or Pokestops taking forever to load. Just not fun.
Also, why can't you also collect Pokestops?
Plus, being on different teams doesn't seem to alter that much stuff. If it had more of a bearing, it might actually be a worthwhile mechanic. You can't see how your team is doing, so why do should we care? Will taking this Gym matter for my team? i have no clue.
As i said, 10 year old me would be pretty happy about this game being released. It brought Pokemon back into the limelight. I work in Soho Square which means i see loads of people each lunch time walking around catching Pokemon. Which is awesome. People chat to each other in the street! When did that last happen?!
Plus, all of my outdated knowledge suddenly has a new use. I can easily name the first 150 Pokemon, and wouldn't find it too hard to do the next 100 that came with Gold / Silver. Suddenly this knowledge is relevant again! Yay!!! I think?
So, i can't hate Pokemon Go. At least it's something. Focusing heavily on the "catch âem all" concept is a smart move, it's just a shame they've removed all of the skill/strategy that made me love the series in the first place.
And here we are; the DC version of the Avengers. First sentence. Shots fired.
I probably should get one thing out the way first; this review is FULL of spoilers. If you've not seen the film, but want to know if you should go and see it, then here's my spoiler free paragraph. Ain't i nice.
âThe more you think about the film, the less sense it makes. There is little to no character progression, and at the end you don't feel anything for any of the characters. Probably don't bother with the cinema trip, unless you're a superhero fan and you're jonesing for a fixâ
Yeah. I'm not a fan. Anyway, if you don't want any more spoilers, don't read on! For the rest of you; lets crack on with the show!
The story arc is this; Superman broke a city. Batman is not happy as that's a lot of power not kept in check. Which is kinda fair enough. Superman isn't happy because Batman is doing rather hard core vigilante justice (like murder and shit. Remember all those Batman comics where he murders everyone? Yeah. I don't).
So, both kinda valid reasons, though I'm personally siding with Batman on this one.
There's a third wheel to this superhero bromance; Lex Luthor. Lex has decided that he can play Superman and Batman against each other forâ¦ Erâ¦ reasons. Yep, âreasons'. And so he gets the fighting and whatnot.
Ignoring the whole Lex thing for a second (I'll come back to him), the reasons behind them fighting is actually rather sound. And generally felt a little deeper than the standard super villain affair. As a viewer, there was no clear âgoodâ side. However, this all fell over for 3 pretty irritating reasons.
Reason 1: Superman was force to fight Batman because Lex had his mum. Yep, that's literally the reason. As a result, when Batman and Superman clashed, you weren't seeing those two ideals clash, but instead a fight which could have been solved with a small amount of prior communication. So, like a text message, or an email. Or something.
Reason 2: The fight is really short between Superman and Batman. Its about 7 minutes, rather slow, though quite entertaining. It ends once Batman finds out Superman has been blackmailed, and they suddenly become best chums and it's all sorted. Yep. There's little to no dialog. Just sort of âBAM! FRIENDS NOW'. Though the reason they become friends is literally that Batmans mum and Supermans Mum have the same name. Dat writing yo.
Reason 3: This whole story arc ends about 2/3's into the film. Yep, it ends. And it's replaced with a Generic CGI Monster number 3. Oh boy. It went from deep, meaningful philosophical debate to giant monster punch up. Because, we've not seen that before, right? RIGHT?!
So, the main story line(s) aren't great. What about the characters?
Ben Affleck as Batman totally nailed it. Batman is in his mid 40's. He's older, tired of fighting, and generally more jaded. He's seen thing man. And Affleck nails this. I had some serious worries he would suck, but he totally steals the show. However, there is no character development. He doesn't change. He doesn't change his view or his outlook. It's all the same.
Superman also doesn't change. He never understands Batman's point of view. Henry Cavill does a passable job, and i can't think of any outstanding moments.
Lex Luthor, played by Jesse Eisenberg, is just flat out insane. There's no underlying reason. He's crazy, and wants to see the world burn. It's a little odd, but at least he was entertaining to watch compared to the angry Batman and the angry Superman. An injection of personality. But the fact his whole character/motivations were so flawed from the get go, it's all a bit of a let down. However, Jesse Eisenberg does a great job, and i throughly enjoyed watching him on screen.
Gal Gadot does an decent job as Wonder Woman. However, there wasn't much for her to do at all in this film. I was confused about her role. She just sort of shows up, does her thing, and we as an audience has no idea who she is, what she can do, or really anything about her. A set up film would have been greatly appreciated. It was great seeing her kick ass against the giant CGI monster. But she was sort of relegated to the background through all of this. However, she does have some AWESOME intro music. Check it out here:
Quick side note on Wonder Woman. Before posting this review, a friend of mine pointed out that Superman has NO dialog with Wonder Woman. NONE. Literally nothing. Instead of asking who Wonder Woman in, Superman turns to Batman and asks âIs she with you?â. That's it. That's all the acknowledgement she gets.
All the other characters do great jobs, but once again they are all just sort of 'there'. There's no growth in this film. All the actors do a great job, but the script and the story just isn't there to support them.
I don't usually do this heading, but this all deserves a special mention. First are the special effects. Throughout, they were pretty solid. However the CGI monster was just that; CGI. It was so obvious, and kinda boring, that as a result i didn't care about it, and also slightly jarring. It had nothing note worthy design wise, and just didn't look at all that great. It had nothing going for it. It was justâ¦ weird.
Now, onto the directing. Usually, I don't notice directing, but when i do it's usually for awesome reasons. However, this time it was because it was just a little bit shit. To start with, each scene felt super fast. One thing would happen, and that would be it. Little character reaction, then we'd them be whisked away to something else. Very frustrating, and gave me a sense of disconnect from the story. However, this did improve as the scenes got longer towards the end. So yay.
If you couldn't work it out from above; I didn't like this film. A storyline that gave up being intelligent to instead become a Monster mash. With no growth of any of the characters, and no real set up for the next films (just one, sodding email) it all sort of resulted in Batman Vs Superman being just a bit of a waste of time. Maybe worth watching when it's released on DVD or Netflix, but nothing more.
Several years ago, I promised myself that I wouldn't get one of the "new" consoles. And by new, I mean the Xbox One or the PS4. Why? Simple really; I'd just bought a P.C. and had no need for a dedicated gaming machine. Plus, the Big Wigs at Microsoft Xbox division were being so full of themselves that they had started to emulate the frat boys that often promote their brand.
Fast forward to 2016, and here am I writing a review for a console I now own. Deal with it, 2014 me.
A bit of extra background with the setup I have. I have the 1 Terabyte Forza console (which was Â£10 cheaper for some reason) which basically means when I press buttons on the console I get different noises, and the box itself is also a slightly weird colour blue.
I also have 4 games;
New consoles means better graphics (unless you're the Wii... BURN!). In the case of the Xbox One, this is definitely true. All of the games I've played have looked stunning. Battle Front, Tomb Raider, and GTA all look stunning. Big open areas. Shiny things are shiny. And so on. It's impressive what we can do now considering 20 years ago we were still limited to basic 3d games. Go humans. So this is an instant, but expected, win.
Next, let's look at the store. Scrolling to the right eventually gets you there. But lord knows how you find shit in there. Imagine a half finished game of mahjong, and you've got what this interface looks like. Tiles. Fucking. Everywhere. It's like someone was playing 52 card pick up and decided the interface should be modeled on it.
Overall, the experience is laggy. Hitting the big "X" button on your controller takes you to the home page. Cool, and useful. Double tapping it brings up a side bar over your game so you can view shit like friends and invites and messages. Also useful. Unfortunately this side bar is as slow as balls, and you spend half your time counteracting your own movements to get to the bit you want.
The layout of this side bar is also confusing, and results in a lot of faffing about to achieve the simplest of tasks.
All in all, it's a crappy experience that, for a company who's been in the computer business for close to 30 years, needs to be fixed and overhauled.
If you remember one of my older posts, I said I loved the first Tomb Raider because it was just silly but very entertaining. This one so far has been more of the same. And you know what, I love it for that! The graphics are stunning. The character performances are all great. And the set pieces are also pretty great too. So I'm very happy with this game. Would recommend (even though I've not finished it yet).
I've only had this a few days, and actually there is so much praise for this game that there's little point me adding to it. Go and buy it. It's pretty great.
Ahahahahahahahahahah seriously EA? Battle Front? Ok, yeah you can fuck off right now. This game is nothing like its predecessors. The name Battle Front is nothing but a cheap marketing ploy. This game has NO similarities to any of the battle front games. Let me explain; I was a massive fan of the previous Star Wars: Battle Front games. I played them for years. As did many of my friends. So when I found out there was finally a revival of the franchise, I was super excited. I think me and several friends literally, not figuratively, cheered in unison when it was announced.
So, when the beta was announced, I signed up and played it on my P.C. I was instantly in awe of how pretty it looked and sounded. It was like stepping into star wars. They nailed it.
But very soon, it started to fall apart. "Where's the class system?" "What's with these cards? Why can't I just have grenades?" and "Wait, what the fuck are the tokens?"
Yep. Everything that made Battle front, battle front, had been gutted and replaced.
I have several major gripes. Let's start with the first; ships. In the old games, the ships would be docked in locations where players could jump in and use. Multiple players could use them, and fill out extra turrets etc. This was great! But now, ships have been replaced with tokens on the battle field. They are hard to find (unless you already know where they are) and don't allow for coop at all. The ships themselves are nice to pilot, but other than dog fighting with your opponent ships, you can't do anything else. They can't really attack the ground, as they fly too fast. All in all, a pointless mechanic if you can't influence the ground battle.
My second major gripe is the lack of strategy. The designers went for "action matters" approach. This does work, and it's great fun to blast a load of opponents etc. But, if you want to coordinate, it's impossible. It's just two groups of players mashing at each other. In the older games, the battle field was more open. You could flank. You could hold ground in a defensive spot. There's none of that now, and the longativity of this game WILL suffer because of it.
Ok, I have loads more gripes, but here's one final one; DLC. The game is Â£50. The "season pass dlc" is another Â£37. That's Â£87 for a game. The DLC is maps and a couple of extra modes. Seriously, WHAT THE FUCK. There is NO single player. There is no justification except money grabbing. One day, and I suspect soon, publishers will fall on themselves with this model and video gamers just give up in frustration.
The more astute of you will notice that I was talking about the beta, and quite negatively, but still ended up buying it for Xbox One. Why? One simple, and annoying reason. It's kinda fun.
It's no strings attached fun. It's not deep. It's not clever. It's just... fun. But I don't see myself still playing this in a years' time. And instead over the years I'll probably become more bitter for what EA has done to this franchise.
One final addition; it's really slow to load on XBOX. It's much faster on P.C.
Wow I wrote a lot about that game. Sorry.
Once a year, I like to do a roundup of games. However, this year I've played a grand total of around 3, with most of them being released a few years before, or a remake. So doesn't make for a great list. However, this year I've seen a truck tonne of films; from Star Wars the Force Awakens, to The Hobbit: Battle Of The Five Armies, to Jurassic World. So this year I thought I'd go ahead and do my top 3, as well as my worst film of the year. This list was actually really hard to come up with. We've had some great films out this year, from the wonderful Inside Out, to loads of good Marvel films, to some awesome (and awful) reboots.
Ah The Martian. I went to this film out of a suggestion from a friend (Shout out there buddy) and really rather enjoyed it! A film about a man being stuck on a Mars for 4 years shouldn't be as funny as it is, yet somehow it had me laughing all the way through.
Ok, that makes me sound like some sadistic arsehole, but hear me out. The whole concept of a man being stuck on Mars is rather scary. And the film could have been about how horrid and rough it really could be to survive there. However, instead of getting bogged down in "Oh god, we left a man there to die", it instead follows a true spirit of not giving up. And as result, you end up with some truly funny moments, as Matt Demon talks himself through 4 years in Isolation.
Of course, this film is based on a book, and apparently the book is much funnier but it's great to see an adaptation embrace its roots and follow in a similar vain.
So, like all of these films on this list, you should totally go and see it!
Oh JJ. Abrahams, you wonderful man. You managed to do what many thought was impossible; update, reinvigorate, and breathe new life into this amazing franchise. Seriously, if you've not seen it, go! It's got everything, from laughs, to a decent level of fan service. It's not a perfect film by any means, but I loved it.
I will (probably) be doing a write up of it soon. Until then, just go see it in the cinema!
Ok, it was super difficult to decide on a film. We've had some great ones, but Ex-Machina was one that has constantly stood out as a personal favourite not just of this year, but has been permanently addition to my favourite film list. I've done a complete write up of it here, which explains my view points in depth. But suffices to say that this film is not one you want to miss, even though you probably did.
This film had me on the edge of my seat throughout, and kept me guessing on where it was going to head next. Not many other films this year has achieved that.
So go and watch it right now. Like, seriously, go! The rest of this can wait!
So, what was my worst film of 2015? Oh, dear reader; it was one you weren't expecting. It was...
50 Shades of Grey.
Yep. A film most people wouldn't have expected me to have seen, yet somehow I have. And let me tell you, it was easily one of the most boring few hours of my year. This film fails in almost every single way I can imagine. It figuratively stumbles around, like some drunkard, for its running length (125 minutes!!!) until it eventually just sort of "ends"Â, and you're expected to be looking forward to its sequel.
Obviously, I'm not exactly the target audience. But really, if you ignore the subject matter, this film is just flat out bad. There is NO character progression. There nothing here for the audience to bond with (joke about bondage), and amazingly fails to be at all raunchy. I've seen more on a DAZ advert (though, the sheets in the film were rather "brilliantly white"Â).
So, 50 Shades, you're my Worst Film. The film that made me watch another film after just to wash out the bad flavour of this film. I was DRUNK watching this film, and STILL found it dull.
Have I ranted enough? Yeah? Good.
Anyway, onto a new year with new movies. Films like DeadPool, Captain America: Civil War, Rouge One, Independence Day: Resurgence (yep, this is a thing?!), and Finding Dory (just why?).
Is it weird that the more of that previous sentence I wrote, the less I was looking forward to the Movies of 2016?
So, the Fantastic 4. I wrote about this a little earlier on in the year, stating how it didn't deserve the stick it has gotten. And I still believe that. Currently it's at 10% on Rotten Tomatoes while in contrast The Last Airbender (categorically the WORST FILM EVER MADE) sits on 6%. Even 50 Shades sits at 25% somehow?
Yeah, sure this film is a mess. But you could see its potential shining through (except the last 20 minutes where you just KNOW some prick in a suit with little to no original thought turned up on set and started changing shit), and had a good movie buried deep within it. It's a shame, and one I hope FOX has learned from.Who am I kidding? FOX cancelled Firefly. Same again next year, yeah??
Ah Summer. You're a bit like Hubba Bubba gum or a new series of Sherlock; great but never hang around long enough. Anyway, so summer is now over, and I've decided to do a movie round up of what I've seen. It's be one mostly fully of Super Hero films (some asked for, others not) as well as remakes. In some cases both! Anyway, let's get on with it!
Oh, slight spoiler warning. If you've not seen the below films probably don't read ahead. Or do. Just, yeah you're old enough to make up your own mind.
First up, we have a film that was actually release at the start of the summer. Ok, April might be pushing the whole summer thing a little, but sod it it's my blog. Actually, I've already written a review for it, so go ahead and read it here. Basically, I said it was pretty great and worth a watch, though not as good as the original.
However, I will add that I've just bought it on DVD and found it difficult to finish. Just... It's kinda long. Maybe it's me just being a little fussy. Anyway, go read the previous review.
Holy crap I didn't think this would ever turn up. I remember hearing about this film a good number of years ago, and expected for it to have a permanent place in movie hell.
So, here we are in 2015 and not only has this film been released, it was bloody brilliant! Good CGI, nice throw backs to the previous films, and there's a bit at the beginning where you're flying over the park where you think "Fuck Disney land, why can't this place exist?"
The story had some serious flaws, such as some random Dino team up at the end (Seriously what?!) and one story thread that didn't go anywhere and was subsequently eaten by a Raptor (actually happened, not joking). Of course, no one can talk about this film without mentioning the elephant in the room; the lead characters stilettos! Seriously, she doesn't take them off, yet can run through forest and mud, along with outrunning a T-Rex. I don't know what was going on there. Maybe a 90's throw back of its own kind?
Either way, I highly recommend the film!
Pixar you cruel bastards. You have a direct line to my heart, and once again there was little holding back. A funny, intelligent, and emotional piece of film work Inside Out is easily the stand out film this year.
It speaks to everyone, as pretty much everyone went through similar times in their own life. Joy of being young and not needing to worry. Having imaginary friends. And understanding that all emotions have their right time and place. I think the moment that actually spoke to me most was the part right at the end, where the lead character speaks to a boy in the hockey rink. The little people inside his head just freak out and don't know what to do. This has happened to me too many times in my life to count. And I know other people out there connected to the film in their own way. So well done once again Pixar for making cinema gold. Again. Have you done some weird deal with a demon or something?
For those of you who know me in the real world, you'll know I love Comic books. And Ant-Man is one of my favourites. Loads of great witty moments, and not afraid to have a an ending you weren't quite expecting. Scott Lang is a screw up. He's not going to suddenly make the right decisions now he's got some magic suit.
So, does this film deliver? Errr... no. It suffers from a few key issues.
First, pacing. There's a real lull in the middle, and just isn't funny enough to carry it through this stage. Second, one of the key jokes was actually ruined in the trailer. If they could like not do that that would be great. Thanks. Actually, this film tries to ride on humour a lot, but doesn't deliver. It's not a comedy film.
It does have a few saving graces. First is Anthony. How the hell did a film make me care about an ant???? There was also the key, incredibly obvious, love interest. You know the drill; both hate each other, they slowly warm to each other, and bam! They're together at the end. Ok, this is pretty much exactly how this played out. But, its big difference was that I disliked the love interest at first, and grew like her throughout the film. First time where this has actually happened. So well done there! All in all, Ant-Man isn't a bad film. It's certainly no Spiderman or Fantastic 4. Speaking of which...
You know what? I didn't hate it. I went in expecting to be bored. To be angry that this was made. And instead? I was disappointed. Disappointed because I totally saw what the director was after. I saw the vision that he had; a dark, slightly more brooding version of these characters. And it was totally working up until about... Actually, you want my advice? Go ahead and watch the first half or two thirds. Then just leave. Or turn off your DVD player. Because dear god does it fall off a cliff. You can see the point where some executive came down from his lofty perch, looked around and said "Where's all the action? I ordered an action film didn't I? You, director man! Make me action. People want action!" And so it was said, it was done. And thus there's a real jarring change towards the end.
I can't recommend, but it seriously doesn't deserve the horrid ratings it's gotten.
And so that's it for my round up. Hope you've enjoyed it. On with winter films like Star Wars... And, er... Star Wars!
Three years ago, one of my all-time favourite films was released; Avengers Assemble. Converging all of the current Marvel film franchises into one super movie (like some sort of Hollywood power polygamous relationship) was one of the greatest movie experiences I'd seen in a long time, as well as being a tight and well written film on its own merits. Avengers Assemble then went on to break box office records, and earn more money than most counties make. So of course a sequel was inevitable. It's business. But how does it stack up? Does Age of Ultron match its predecessor?
I'll try and keep this spoiler free as possible by the way, but as with all reviews I'd suggest you'd just go and watch it. It's Marvel. It's got what you'd expect. Go see it.
The film opens to the team storming a Castle... somewhere. The actions in full swing. Thor's swinging Mjolnir (his hammer). Captain America is flinging his shield around. Iron Man is being all science-y and flying around. And Hulk is well... Hulking. So, pretty standard affair.
From here we find out they are still after Loki's staff. Once inside they grab it, and return to Avengers tower. Before returning it to Asgard, Iron Man analyses' it and attempts to make an A.I. out of it (as you do). And thus Ulton is born. Things go tits up, and the team end up battling him.
So, all very Sci-fi and action-y etc. And all very enjoyable. The fights are all very well set up. The banter between the team mates is as strong and brilliant as ever, and it totally scratches that super hero itch.
Actually, the banter between the team mates is easily the best part of this film. There's a bit early on where they are all relaxing around a table, and each of them try to lift Mjolnir. Very funny, and ends up being a running gag throughout the film.
There are also some stand out set pieces. The opening fight is one of them, and so is the fight between Hulk and Iron man. (Not a spoiler, it's in like all of the trailers.) Unfortunately, I'd say the final big clash at the end just feels a little muddled. And I think this is down to Ultron's character.
Let me explain. Ulton is an evil A.I. He's witty, dark, and powerful. But, somehow, he's just not got enough bite to be held up as a great super villain. Loki was evil in a Prince Joffrey kind of way. The Joker was just insane. Bane was driven and a badass. Ulton kinda just... isn't. His motives are a touch confusing at times. Don't get me wrong, he's a great character. Especially the creepy Pinocchio reference. But this level of creepy could have been played up so much more, and turned him into something really scary. But instead he just comes across as a weirdly driven robot who wants to murder people. In cinema, that's kinda been done.
Which leads to the ultimate clash between the team and him. The stakes are high, but the whole fight is just a cluster fuck of knowing that what's going on has huge repercussions, but lacking any real "bite"Â.
There are also two new characters who, for the life of me, I can't remember the names of. Ones got super speed, the others got some cool mind control stuff. They are referred to as "Abnormals"Â and not Mutants. Does FOX own the rights to that term or something? They are both sort of one dimensional characters, and I couldn't really get on board with their plight.
Side characters also make a nice addition. War Machine and Falcon are here, with the former being the butt of the "Not really as cool as Iron Man"Â joke a lot. It works, and got a lot of laughs with the audience I was with.
All of the cast deliver, with no one phoning it in. In fact Hawkeye, Bruce Banner, and Black Widow all feel much more relevant and engaging this time around. That's impressive as I've always considered them the least interesting of the group.
I guess what you can take away from the story is that it's entertaining, and it set up the next few years of Marvel movies without giving anything away. Except Marvel ruined that by announcing what's going to be released for the next 10 years. Nice going marketing department.
Maybe it's just me, but I seem to notice CGI in films. Especially when the films in 3D. In my view, CGI should blend seamlessly, and not stand out. Unfortunately, this doesn't quite happen, and it's especially noticeable when it comes to CGI characters. Both Hulk and Ulton look great by themselves, but as soon as they start interacting with someone, you notice that they don't look right. They don't feel real.
This aside, they do look great. Hulk looks greener and Hulkier than ever. While Ultron has cool moving parts you can see whirling and moving as he speaks. Much like with the Iron Man suits.
Ultrons design however confuses me. The way his mouth moves is very "human"Â. Arguably this is the point, as well as helps to convey the emotion of the character. Yet because the mouth moves, to me you lose some of the creepiness of the character. The Cybermen from Dr Who, or even General Grievous from Star Wars had a slit mouth (thing?) that couldn't move. That's infinitely creepier. However, his cheeks slide in and out, exposing the sort of red flame of a throat. This looks amazing, and totally a cool choice.
The set pieces are expertly done. They all look amazing, and the action is well choreographed and performed. The CGI used during Iron Man's and Hulks fight is awesome, with buildings and cars being smashed all over the place. Awesome.
The music is the standard orchestral affair. No real stand out moments, except the opening theme at the start totally got me pumped for the film. Musically, Guardians of the Galaxy this ain't.
Let's be honest here; you're reading this after seeing them film. And if you've not seen it; you know you are.
The weird thing is that above all I've done is tear it down and say it's not very good. That's just not correct. I loved it.
Its action packed, witty, and has some truly wonderful moment. I have a rule though; if I think about my watch and what time it currently is in the cinema I know there's something wrong here. And unfortunately this happened. It's a little bloated and overly long, with motives that didn't quite make sense and a story with so much going on that you forget how cool some of it was.
But I loved it anyway, and would be more than happy to see it again in the cinema. It's an excellent action film, an excellent super hero film, and in some ways a great comedy; the one lines are excellent.
So, if you've not seen it; go ahead and do. It's worth your money. It's worth your time. Come on, what else are you gunna do on a Friday night?
Seriously, how the fuck do cinemas do it? How are cinemas singularly the best and worst place to watch a film? It's effectively a cave filled with other people and their farts, most of whom can barely go 5 minutes without rustling or coughing.
Ok, maybe I'm just a little bitter. Let me set you the scene of what I experienced.
First, the price; Â£19 to see it in 3D in Leicester Square. Next; due to my borked eye sight, the 3D glasses didn't fit over my glasses and so had to lean my head back an extra amount just to view the thing I'd spent Â£19 on. (Alright, my fault on those accounts).
Then, about midway through the film, my legs started to hurt because we were packed in and no room to stretch at all. No one would call me Lofty (I'm 5'10 thank you very much) but even I struggled. (Not my fault here).
Oh, and then we have the worst offenders; other sodding people. I was sat next to some guy that did nothing but cough loudly throughout. And every fucking time, I got a wonderful whiff of his earlier glass(es) of bourbon. Oh and he committed cinema sin; he got up to use the bathroom half way through. Seems that any form of curtesy seems to have been lost. Eh.
Bonus round over. Score: Angry.
Anyone who's been paying attention to the news in the last few months, will notice there's been an unusual amount of chatter about what will happen if/when computers gain sentience (or A.I). The general gist of this news has been that the Human race is doomed, and we should just throw in the towel to our new Robotic overlords now.
However, let's not despair just yet, and perhaps indulge in a not too distant feature where A.I is on the cusps of being a reality. Enter Ex_Machina. True, this isn't the first film to tackle A.I. and the human complications associated with it (See, coincidently, the film called A.I.). So how does it compare?
It starts with Caleb (Domhnall Gleeson) winning a competition which takes him to go visit the technological super star Nathan (Oscar Isaac), who also happens to be Caleb's boss, for a week.
Caleb is whisked away to Nathans secluded house in the forest. Before long we learn that this isn't a house or a simple visit to see the boss for a week. It's in fact a super-secret research facility, with one hell of a project that Nathans been working on; Ava (Alicia Vikander).
Ava is an A.I, and Caleb's been brought in to test her.
All sounds pretty simple and harmless, but as the plot unfolds everything starts getting more sinister.
I'm going to quickly talk about the Tech discussed in this film. As a software developer at heart, it was nice to see that not all of this was too farfetched. Nathan is the CEO of a large Internet Search company (*Cough*), and to get Ava to work, he had to tap into everyone's phone across the worlds, and access all the cameras and microphones, and use what everyone was searching to form the base of the A.I. All of this is very close to what we have today, and what could be achieved in a not too distant future. Scary stuff!It was also very nice to see some real computer code on screen. Something a lot of directors ignore and don't bother with. Really added to the realism of the whole film.
All of the Actors throughout the film (there aren't many) play their part exceptionally well. Caleb lacks any real personality, but it makes it much easier for the view to put themselves in his spot. As a result when he puts questions to Ava, it's exactly what the average person would ask. Gleeson does an excellent job, and it's not a performance I can fault.
The same goes to Isaac. He portrays Nathan to be exactly what you'd expect an eccentric genius to be. However it's Vikander that truly sells the A.I performance. She moves in a way that looks like something attempting to move normally. It's very much what you'd expect for a robot to move like. And no, I'm not talking 80's dancing. Vikander facial expressions are also very clever; a mixture of human and what a robot might interpret as human without being weird, and she totally nails it. Her whole performance if brilliant, and sells the concept and the movie.
Let's talk CGI. Many of you will have seen the trailer (if not I've added above). Throughout the film, Ava is shown to have her midsection exposed, and displaying Moving parts. Only her face, hands, and feet are actually covered in synthetic skin. The CGI used here I feel is a bit of a mixed bag. Sometimes it works, and other times it looks cheap and unnecessary. We know she's a robot. We get it. At times, it looks like CGI, which takes you out of the immersion the writing and acting spend so much time building. Very minor gripe though.
However, the aesthetic of the film is spot on. Everything feels very real. Nathans forest house is subtly futuristic. It's still very much rooted in reality and functionality. The sound is something I should also comment on. Brilliant electro tracks back most of the film (think Tron), which totally add to some of the really tense moments. The sound design can be a little on the nose at times (Nathan's house has classical playing in the background all the time), but for the most part it all adds to the isolation of where house is, and the eerie tone of the film.
It's rare that I'm still thinking about all the clever moments and choices well after the credits have rolled. But 24 hours later, I'm still coming up with new theories and new thoughts about why certain things happened, and what it all means.
This is Alex Garland's director debut, and he does a stunning job. He's been writing for a while (Beach, 28 days later) and his story weaving skill certainly shines here. I'm very much look forward to his next. This film is easily on the list of best of the year (It's only January?!), and will be one I'll certainly be watching again. It's on my list of favourite films of all time, and it's certainly something anyone with even a mild interest in technology should see.
Since becoming an "adult" I've noticed I've had less and less time to actually game, which makes my inner child cry a little bit. However I did get to play a few and so thought "Sod it, lets share my thoughts with the 6 bots that scrape my website every few weeks". So I give to you Harry's Game of the Year!
First, some ground rules:
The story was more confusing than our current political system, and would introduce characters who would then do something and then disappeared again for reasons, but was so difficult to notice these flaws when you're broadsiding a ship while yelling "Fire everything!".
Ah Transistor. I actually wrote a review for this for a friends website, and thoroughly praised it. If you've not played it, then go ahead and do! Both it's sound track and art style are wonderful that I can't bring myself to make any form of crass joke about it (go ahead and quote that Super Giant Games; I give permission).
It's biggest flaw has to be that I've had no reason to go back to it (except enjoy the soundtrack). This makes me sad, and I loved the world and characters. Bring on the next game Super Giant Games! I'm waiting!!!
Alpha Sapphire now suffers from the above too. However, it does have the nostalgia factor which initially sold it for me. But holy crap do the towns and overall design feel a little dated now. Why is everything designed for 2 dimensions, yet you can run in three dimensions? But here's the thing though; Pokemon is still great. Characters are still charming. Battling is still irritatingly addictive. And I still get a kick out of bossing a Gym. I'll be buying the next one, and shamefully enjoy it.
With now the addition of a tablet version, its rather likely I'll be playing this game well into the new year. Oh and it totally goes with my short attention span!
With it's great game play (stalking through the brush with a bow and arrow) and just feeling like a total bad ass through out, of course this game had to make my list.
There is of course that moment where you face off against a boss, and it's subsequently defeated by a quick time event. Not that I'm bitter about that. Not after all that build up. Nope. Not at all. Oh, it was also one of the games I actually managed to finish this year! Go me!